|
Lean University --
Lean Articles
Rally
’round reliability
At
Cargill, reliability is more than a maintenance function.
It’s an overarching approach to plant, business and
personal growth.
This
is a story about equipment reliability. If you work in the
plant maintenance department, that sentence caught your
attention. If you don’t work in maintenance — you’re
in plant management, production, operations, procurement,
etc. — did you assume this story wasn’t for you? Well,
it is.
Over
the past decade, the word “reliability” has become
synonymous in industrial facilities with the word
“maintenance.”
A
growing number of plants refer to their maintenance
mechanics as “reliability technicians” and inject
reliability into the titles of their maintenance managers.
The nation’s largest professional organization for
maintenance leaders, the Society for Maintenance &
Reliability Professionals, was founded in 1992 and now
boasts more than 2,000 members. At its 2004 conference,
approximately 15 percent of attendees had reliability in
their title.
The
blurring of these words is indeed tied to a strategic shift
in industry from the reactive care and maintenance of
production machinery (a way to maintain the status quo) to
more proactive and progressive methods (seeking mechanical
reliability and predictability).
But
when dictionaries define maintenance as the upkeep of
property or equipment, and reliability as the extent to
which an experiment, test or measuring procedure yields the
same results on repeated trials, does the idea of
“reliability equals maintenance” shortchange your plant?
Are the results, repeatability, robustness and reliability
of your plant-floor capital assets simply a function of the
maintenance department?
“That’s
so far from the truth it’s not even funny,” says Tom
Katalinich, who manages a Cargill soybean processing plant
in Sioux City, Iowa. “If you think you’re going to do
reliability solely out of the maintenance department,
you’re off track. Upper-level managers and people from all
disciplines have to get in on it at the front end and make
it part of the business plan. You need to be hands on.
Cargill understands equipment reliability impacts the
customer and the entire business. It’s everyone’s
responsibility.”
Reboot
and revamp
Cargill, America’s largest private corporation and one of
its most successful (2004 sales of nearly $63 billion), has
sharpened and broadened its focus on reliability over the
past 10 years.
In
1995, it created a corporate-led Maintenance and Reliability
Center of Excellence. Back then, though, the COE’s main
push was the implementation of a computerized maintenance
management system (CMMS) software product.
“After
a few years of wandering through the wilderness, we found
that the focus was wrong,” says Tim Goshert, who today
heads the COE and serves as the company’s worldwide
reliability and maintenance manager. “Software is only a
tool. You need to change your practices and procedures. No
process equals no payback.”
The
COE’s role, influence and importance grew with the help
and support of senior corporate leaders such as Ron
Christenson, Cargill’s chief technology officer and
executive vice president for worldwide operations.
|
‘Cross-pollination’
links production and maintenance
At many plants, the relationship between
production/operations and maintenance is poor.
It’s “us” and “them.” According to the
two sides, “maintenance is the necessary evil”
and “production breaks the machines.”
How
has Cargill been able to bring its maintenance and
production/operations organizations together for
this reliability initiative?
“There
are intermixed career paths here,” explains
worldwide reliability and maintenance manager Tim
Goshert. “We have maintenance people today who
will eventually be operations managers. We have
operations people who may someday be maintenance
leaders. There is cross-pollination across the
organization. It all depends on that person’s
career path and Cargill’s needs.”
Goshert
speaks from experience.
“I’m
not a mechanical engineer,” he says. “I grew
up in operations in the chemical business.
However, I’ve spent the past decade in
maintenance.” |
“Ron
started us down the path of getting a group of ‘experts’
together to oversee maintenance and reliability,” says
Goshert.
In
1998, a steering committee for the center was assembled.
Instead of going vertical, with maintenance leaders focused
purely on maintenance issues, the 11-member committee is
cross-functional and views reliability in a larger sense.
“We
concluded that if we just focus on the maintenance side of
the business, we would miss the rest of the organization,”
says committee member Rick Baldridge, the reliability
functional leader for Cargill’s grain and oilseeds
processing division. “We needed one common reliability
vision — one vision that involved all professional
disciplines.”
That
vision, says Baldridge, involves “early detection and
elimination of defects, regardless of where they are coming
from — conceptual design, procurement, installation,
equipment operation, equipment maintenance, wherever.”
Tied closely to that are the concepts of productivity and
availability.
“The
goal is to allow our operating facilities to produce product
for customers whenever they want it, however they want
it,” says Goshert. “To do that, you must have reliable
plants. To do that, you must have healthy assets,
facilities, equipment and processes.”
As
a supplement to the overarching committee, the Cargill COE
spun off steering committees for each of the processing
technologies. For example, the oilseeds committee, led by
Baldridge, includes six maintenance managers, three plant
managers and a regional business manager. The group sets
procedures and strategies for equipment reliability within
the business unit and examines areas of opportunity.
“It’s
very important to me,” says Katalinich, a committee
member. “The biggest thing I do is provide 20 years of
experience and comment from my position as plant manager on
how I see things and how the processes fit into my
business.”
Baldridge
says the committee’s makeup provides “significant
advantages” over an all-maintenance unit.
“(Members)
now speak the language of their functional area and the
language of maintenance and reliability,” he says. “They
can translate what we are doing from a reliability
perspective to their professional disciplines.”
Reading,
writing and RCM
Cargill’s reliability strategy is in the form of lean
manufacturing tools such as Reliability-Centered Maintenance
(also known as Reliability-Centered Manufacturing). The RCM
approach involves closely examining machinery and processes
and then identifying the potential risks, failure modes and
solutions to enhanced reliability, thus impacting
productivity, availability, agility, repeatability and
profitability. Representatives from maintenance,
engineering, production, purchasing, the tool crib and other
areas can serve as members of an RCM team.
“You
need input from all sides,” says Katalinich.
RCM
is part of the curriculum of a reliability workshop taught
by Goshert and Baldridge at Cargill sites around the globe.
The duo has trained more than 2,300 employees since 2000,
including 500 last year.
“When
we started, attendees were primarily maintenance
practitioners,” says Baldridge. “Now, two-thirds are in
jobs other than maintenance.”
While
the workshops draw key plant leaders, the reliability vision
and model is disseminated to the masses through several
mediums.
Awareness
sessions are “town hall meetings” that give employees at
each plant the opportunity to learn and ask questions.
The
Reliability Exercise is a board game created and customized
for Cargill by Sim Learning. Players representing all plant
functions — “from the janitor to the plant manager,”
says Goshert — get to see how everyone’s role
contributes to the success of reliability.
Also,
an area on Cargill’s company intranet site houses a wealth
of information (workshop schedules, articles, news, reading
lists) on reliability, as well as letters of support from
top corporate leaders.
‘Yardstick’
of excellence
If Cargill had limited the initiative to steering
committees, workshops and visibility opportunities, the
effort still would be fairly unique and praiseworthy. The
company, though, went much further by maximizing its
involvement with SMRP.
“We
wanted to develop and horizontally leverage best practices
— not only across our own business unit, but across
Cargill,” says Baldridge. “The fastest way to accelerate
that is through skills enhancement. If we don’t know what
we don’t know, it’s pretty hard to not only develop but
execute those processes.”
For
individual Cargill employees, that translates to: The more
you know, the more you grow.
“Cargill
has a history of rewarding successful employees,” says
Goshert.
For
the company as a whole, it translates as follows: A
standardized training regimen (or bar of excellence) could
shorten the knowledge and skills gaps between key personnel
at all plants and allow for easier transfer of best
practices and improvement ideas.
The
company played an active role as SMRP explored the
development of a certification examination for maintenance
and reliability professionals in the late 1990s. Cargill’s
Charlie Fast, Matt Meyer and Goshert did early survey and
development work. The company also became a sustaining
member of the SMRP Certifying Organization (SMRPCO), the
group that formalized the certification process and created
the Certified Maintenance & Reliability Professional (CMRP)
test.
Meyer
and Goshert became SMRPCO board members, and a handful of
Cargill COE steering committee members took the initial beta
exam in fall 2000.
Cargill
embraced the CMRP because the body of knowledge matched the
company’s vision for reliability and its need to develop
well-rounded, 21st-century plant decision-makers.
“Maintenance
and reliability professionals need to be balanced,” says
Goshert. “They need to understand business and speak the
language of business, which is money. To get anything done
in business, they have to understand how to lead and
influence people. They have to understand the manufacturing
processes that surround them. They also must understand
equipment reliability and work management.”
To
meet those needs, the CMRP exam encompasses five key areas:
business and management (24.3 percent), manufacturing
process reliability (23), people skills (20.3), work
management (16.2) and equipment reliability (16.2).
“This
is now the standard,” says Goshert. “This is the
yardstick.”
Getting
results
Goshert and Baldridge enthusiastically promote the CMRP to
any and all Cargill employees.
“We
strongly encourage managers and non-managers to take the
exam,” says Baldridge. “It’s not a mandate. We want
people to educate themselves and decide for themselves what
they want to do in the future.”
Adds
Goshert, “If you’re a craftsperson and wish to become a
planner or are a planner and wish to be a maintenance
supervisor, we’ll provide the tools for you. One way to
get there is through passing the CMRP exam.”
Cargill
pays all training, test and travel fees for an employee to
take the exam.
SMRP
data shows Cargill has had more people take and pass the
exam than any other company in the world. From October 2001
(when the first official CMRP exam was offered) to the end
of 2004, 233 employees have taken the test; 117 took it last
year. A total of 101 passed it and achieved certification.
“Whether
you pass the exam or not, it’s an excellent tool for
validating where you are and, through a gap analysis,
understanding the opportunities for improvement that
exist,” says Baldridge. “The only person who fails the
exam is the one who doesn’t take it.”
The
test taker is the only person who sees the results and
score. Reliability and business unit leaders will meet with
the test taker to discuss the results in a general sense and
create action plans for development and growth.
As
a sustaining member in SMRPCO, Cargill annually receives
aggregate data that provides a snapshot of its relative
strengths and weaknesses.
“The
shortcomings we’re seeing in many of our plants are in
business management, people skills and manufacturing process
reliability,” says Goshert. “This gives us the
opportunity to improve in those areas.”
Katalinich,
the Sioux City plant manager, is an advocate of the exam and
its importance to the company.
“It’s
challenging and difficult to pass,” he says. “Even if
you don’t pass, it’s very worthwhile. Spending time
preparing for it and going through it, I learned plenty
about the potential of our improvement process and what it
can do for us on a plant, unit and company level. It
reinvigorated me.”
Twenty
oilseeds unit employees, including eight from backgrounds
outside of maintenance, are now certified. Katalinich is one
of them.
“Our
goal is to have a CMRP at every Cargill location in the near
future,” says Baldridge.
A
firm foundation
Over
the past decade, Cargill has increased its productivity and
performance and reduced its overall costs as a result of its
reliability improvements.
The
company doesn’t directly report on the link between
percentages and dollar totals to the initiative. As a
privately held company, it doesn’t have to dish out such
information to appease Wall Street. Its leaders can simply
smile and offer clues that focusing on reliability has been
time and money well spent.
“My
position didn’t exist five years ago,” says Goshert.
“Maintenance and Reliability COE members are sought out
for advice in different areas. Our sphere of influence is
growing throughout the company.”
“We
function on the foundation of sound reliability,” says
Baldridge. “It’s a difference maker.”
That’s
Cargill’s take. Now, what does reliability mean to you?
This article
appeared in the February/March 2005 issue of MRO
Today magazine. Copyright, 2005.
|